Comments on: Leslie Rule: Following in Her Mother Ann Rule’s New York Times Bestselling Footsteps, but with Her Own Blend of Great Writing and a Dash of the Paranormal!

By: bchboy1

bchboy1 — Fri, 22 May 2009 20:37:20 +0000

Thanks, Leslie for clearing that up !

By: Leslie Rule

Leslie Rule — Fri, 22 May 2009 19:47:07 +0000

There seems to be a misunderstanding here. My Mom (Ann Rule) has not written about Laci Peterson and I have never talked to Laci’s ghost. In fact, I am NOT a psychic. I am a writer who chronicles true ghost stories. Though I have written two novels, the four books of ghost stories are not novels. They are nonfiction books. (For those of you who don’t know, all novels are fiction.)

As I’ve said in my books, I sometimes have strong intuition, but I do not consider myself to be a psychic.

I’m sure Jacqueline was simply drawing an analogy and did not mean to misrepresent the facts.

By: bchboy1

bchboy1 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:58:47 +0000

this blog was about Leslie and her new book. Maybe you should call in and bring up this controversial topic…could be really interesting!

By: A Voice of Sanity

A Voice of Sanity — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:46:43 +0000

If any ‘psychic’ claims that Laci Peterson said she was killed by her husband, that is a sure sign of a fraud.

Peterson was convicted by the media, not by any facts. The police spent 20,000 hours – and found one hair and some cement mess, nothing else. No evidence of murder was ever found despite the $11 million that was spent.

Most who believe Peterson is guilty don’t know what the evidence actually is and so misstate it. To save arguing it here, go look at
Guilty?
to see what the prosecution had – which was nonsense.
Then look at
Innocent!
to see what the real circumstantial evidence in this case actually proved.
18 items of evidence for fetal abduction.
Zero for uxoricide.